Help with tire size for my XJ

Suspension and body lifts, Tires, Wheels, Shocks and accessories

Moderator: Tec Team

Which Super Swampers For My XJ

Poll ended at April 5th, 2010, 10:36 am

33x12.50
7
54%
34x10.5
6
46%
 
Total votes: 13

User avatar
mudmonkey
Posts: 310
Joined: February 20th, 2009, 10:52 am
Location: South Bend Indiana
Contact:

Help with tire size for my XJ

Post by mudmonkey »

Ok i am about ready to buy new tires. I am going with the bias ply Super Swamper LTB's I currently am running 33x12.50x15's I am debating on keeping this size or thinking maybe going with the 34x10.50's I shouldn't have a problem with fitment, since i trimmed the fenders. Would the taller skinnier tires be much difference than my currntly wider ones? I really just dont know what i want to do, any input is appreciated,........ :smt100 :?:
Last edited by mudmonkey on March 6th, 2010, 10:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
bondojones
Posts: 389
Joined: June 26th, 2009, 7:40 pm
Location: Granger Indiana

Tires

Post by bondojones »

That's a great question, I too will like to see what is said about this. Off the cuff I would say ground clearance is your friend...Buy the 34's. But you are losing 2 inches of footprint width and only really gaining 1/2 inch of ground clearance mounted on the vehicle. I think the real answer will be determined by what you want to wheel in the most. If you can't have height AND width, the 33's make more sense. So now I have pointed out the obvious without answering your question, I'll leave it to the experts.

Have fun.
93 Jeep Wrangler with some "modifications"
User avatar
green50gt
Posts: 1356
Joined: January 16th, 2007, 10:08 pm
Location: Goshen

Post by green50gt »

You'd only be gaining about 3/4" in height with the 34's but they weigh 4 pounds lighter than the 13.50's. I'd go with the weight factor personally. Out of curiosity, why do you want to go with a bias ply?

Here are the LTB stats.

http://www.intercotire.com/tires.php?id=7&g=1
User avatar
mudmonkey
Posts: 310
Joined: February 20th, 2009, 10:52 am
Location: South Bend Indiana
Contact:

Post by mudmonkey »

green50gt wrote:You'd only be gaining about 3/4" in height with the 34's but they weigh 4 pounds lighter than the 13.50's. I'd go with the weight factor personally. Out of curiosity, why do you want to go with a bias ply?

Here are the LTB stats.

http://www.intercotire.com/tires.php?id=7&g=1
I was wanting to go bias ply for a couple reasons, one is that I dont drive the jeep on the highway at all really so why not, figured the bias has the softer rubber which is better and more sturdy when airing down, ( which airing down would probably gain me a little on the footprint width huh?) and another small reason is that they are a little cheaper than radials. I am really starting to lean towards the 34's but still would like a little more input. thanks
~MUDMONKEY~ 91 XJ 4.5" Lift, under construction..... sold=TOPLESS 96 Cherokee XJ, 4.5" Lift, 8,000 pound Smittybuilt winch, custom made front bumper,trimmed fenders, 33x12.50x15 TSL SUPER SWAMPERS . *JUNE 2010 JOTM*
User avatar
green50gt
Posts: 1356
Joined: January 16th, 2007, 10:08 pm
Location: Goshen

Post by green50gt »

The descision is ultimiately up to you, however bias ply tires do not flex better than radials based on their design. Something I found on wikipedia or something like that..
The basic carcass of all tires is made up of layers of rubber permeated fabric. These layers are referred to as plies, and the most common fabric used today is polyester. The method or the “direction” these plies are applied, with relations to each other and to the center line of the tread, differentiates between a “bias” and a “radial” tire. The plies on a bias tire run approximately 45 degrees to the center line of the tread, alternating in direction with each layer; thus, they crisscross or run in 90 degree angles to each other. This design or style of construction was common on all tires provided as original equipment, on U.S. built cars, until the early 1970’s. The plies on a radial tire run 90 degrees to the center line of the tire and basically overlap instead of crisscrossing. This new design, actually developed during the Second World War , allows the side walls of the tire to be more “flexible” which provides less rolling resistance, providing better gas mileage, and longer tread life. This “flex” also promotes better adherence to the road, thus better handling on both wet and dry surfaces.
If you are going to use them offroad most of the time, they are cheaper, then I think those are some pretty good reasons. I've had 3 sets of TSL SX's...boy those things were stiff, but wheeled fairly well though I hadn't got into wheeling rocks yet. A thing to note which you can get over, when bias ply tires sit and they are cold, they will develop flat spots so when you take off hold onto your teeth till they warm up! :lol:

If you are firm on bias I vote for the 34's 8)
timsbronco2
Posts: 96
Joined: October 24th, 2007, 8:33 pm
Location: plymouth in

Post by timsbronco2 »

i have had both the 33-13.50 and the 34-10.50 loved them both really soft compound like the bogger the only thing about the 34s i didnt like was when i was in sand they dig
98 xj long arm locked and getting readly to get bigger
User avatar
mudmonkey
Posts: 310
Joined: February 20th, 2009, 10:52 am
Location: South Bend Indiana
Contact:

Post by mudmonkey »

timsbronco2 wrote:i have had both the 33-13.50 and the 34-10.50 loved them both really soft compound like the bogger the only thing about the 34s i didnt like was when i was in sand they dig
That is another thing i was afraid of with only being 10.5 wide, but i am not real big on sand anyway. Would they act the same way in the pea gravel stuff like at badlands? and does airing way down help with this? Thanks everyone for your inputs, still having a hard time deciding lol, leaning more towards the 34's
~MUDMONKEY~ 91 XJ 4.5" Lift, under construction..... sold=TOPLESS 96 Cherokee XJ, 4.5" Lift, 8,000 pound Smittybuilt winch, custom made front bumper,trimmed fenders, 33x12.50x15 TSL SUPER SWAMPERS . *JUNE 2010 JOTM*
User avatar
green50gt
Posts: 1356
Joined: January 16th, 2007, 10:08 pm
Location: Goshen

Post by green50gt »

yes pea gravel they'll dig like a mother. They actually look quite good on a set of 8 wide steelies. yes airing them down will help but they WILL NOT squat like a radial will so not sure how much that will help... Think of it this way...even though they are 10 wides, they are exactly 1 inch narrower than a 12.50 TSL... So you are actually getting about an 11.50.
User avatar
mudmonkey
Posts: 310
Joined: February 20th, 2009, 10:52 am
Location: South Bend Indiana
Contact:

Post by mudmonkey »

thank you to everyone that put their two cents in on this, really appreciate it, but i just got done ordering tires tonight. decided to go with the 33's, but not the LTB's, I went with TSL the stats actually say they measure one inch taller than 34's and inch wider, and deeper tread depth too. a little more money but i think worth it, here is a link in case anyone wants to see my new debt lol...... http://www.ntwonline.com/TSL_-_SUPER_SW ... 6b34386124
~MUDMONKEY~ 91 XJ 4.5" Lift, under construction..... sold=TOPLESS 96 Cherokee XJ, 4.5" Lift, 8,000 pound Smittybuilt winch, custom made front bumper,trimmed fenders, 33x12.50x15 TSL SUPER SWAMPERS . *JUNE 2010 JOTM*
User avatar
green50gt
Posts: 1356
Joined: January 16th, 2007, 10:08 pm
Location: Goshen

Post by green50gt »

Not an inch but bigger yes. According to Interco's website the 34 LTB had a 33.6 height, and the 33 TSL had a 33.7 height. You were also right on tread depth the 33 TSL is 2/32" taller. $88 bucks(x4) more for an extra 1 inch of width....sorry that sounds dirty. 8) Right on man, post up some pics, I had some 33" TSL's once...

Image
Duff
Posts: 658
Joined: April 19th, 2009, 10:32 am
Location: Spring Hill, TN

Post by Duff »

awesome - more Swampers on the trail :D
: 98 TJ : 14" coilovers : 35 TSL : D44/D60 4:88 ARB : Warn 8274 : Snorkel : Lights :
User avatar
mudmonkey
Posts: 310
Joined: February 20th, 2009, 10:52 am
Location: South Bend Indiana
Contact:

Post by mudmonkey »

Duff wrote:awesome - more Swampers on the trail :D
yeah my first choice was the boggers, but my wallet said "he double hockey sticks" no. just couldn't do it this time. cant wait to get em though, will def post pics as soon as i mount them.
~MUDMONKEY~ 91 XJ 4.5" Lift, under construction..... sold=TOPLESS 96 Cherokee XJ, 4.5" Lift, 8,000 pound Smittybuilt winch, custom made front bumper,trimmed fenders, 33x12.50x15 TSL SUPER SWAMPERS . *JUNE 2010 JOTM*
User avatar
mudmonkey
Posts: 310
Joined: February 20th, 2009, 10:52 am
Location: South Bend Indiana
Contact:

Post by mudmonkey »

green50gt wrote:Not an inch but bigger yes. According to Interco's website the 34 LTB had a 33.6 height, and the 33 TSL had a 33.7 height. You were also right on tread depth the 33 TSL is 2/32" taller. $88 bucks(x4) more for an extra 1 inch of width....sorry that sounds dirty. 8) Right on man, post up some pics, I had some 33" TSL's once...

Image
You are correct, i meant the ones that i got were about an inch taller than the "TSL RADIAL" which specs stated 32.7 tall and 9.4 wide. my bad lol, :smt073 was you happy with them on the bronco?
~MUDMONKEY~ 91 XJ 4.5" Lift, under construction..... sold=TOPLESS 96 Cherokee XJ, 4.5" Lift, 8,000 pound Smittybuilt winch, custom made front bumper,trimmed fenders, 33x12.50x15 TSL SUPER SWAMPERS . *JUNE 2010 JOTM*
User avatar
green50gt
Posts: 1356
Joined: January 16th, 2007, 10:08 pm
Location: Goshen

Post by green50gt »

It actually never left that spot. But they looked awesome.
User avatar
mudmonkey
Posts: 310
Joined: February 20th, 2009, 10:52 am
Location: South Bend Indiana
Contact:

Post by mudmonkey »

haha, well as long as it looked good! Thats all that mattered right. Mine should be here tomorrow hopefully (per fed ex website) Plan on mounting them this weekend!!!! woohoo cant wait.
~MUDMONKEY~ 91 XJ 4.5" Lift, under construction..... sold=TOPLESS 96 Cherokee XJ, 4.5" Lift, 8,000 pound Smittybuilt winch, custom made front bumper,trimmed fenders, 33x12.50x15 TSL SUPER SWAMPERS . *JUNE 2010 JOTM*
User avatar
mudmonkey
Posts: 310
Joined: February 20th, 2009, 10:52 am
Location: South Bend Indiana
Contact:

Post by mudmonkey »

TIRES FINALLY MOUNTED TODAY!!!!
~MUDMONKEY~ 91 XJ 4.5" Lift, under construction..... sold=TOPLESS 96 Cherokee XJ, 4.5" Lift, 8,000 pound Smittybuilt winch, custom made front bumper,trimmed fenders, 33x12.50x15 TSL SUPER SWAMPERS . *JUNE 2010 JOTM*
User avatar
its all blue 95
Posts: 111
Joined: December 11th, 2007, 9:57 am
Location: Niles,MI

Post by its all blue 95 »

so what tires did you get
89 2door xj 3" rustys and 33'' LTB's,
custom front bumper and black rock rims

stolen 95 yj 4" rough country lift 33" tires custom front bumper

JOTM JUN'' 09- 95 YJ
User avatar
green50gt
Posts: 1356
Joined: January 16th, 2007, 10:08 pm
Location: Goshen

Post by green50gt »

pics or its all lies!!!
User avatar
mudmonkey
Posts: 310
Joined: February 20th, 2009, 10:52 am
Location: South Bend Indiana
Contact:

Post by mudmonkey »

Image
~MUDMONKEY~ 91 XJ 4.5" Lift, under construction..... sold=TOPLESS 96 Cherokee XJ, 4.5" Lift, 8,000 pound Smittybuilt winch, custom made front bumper,trimmed fenders, 33x12.50x15 TSL SUPER SWAMPERS . *JUNE 2010 JOTM*
User avatar
bondojones
Posts: 389
Joined: June 26th, 2009, 7:40 pm
Location: Granger Indiana

Tires

Post by bondojones »

Hey they look AWESOME dude!

I'll be you can't wait to get 'em dirty. :supz:
93 Jeep Wrangler with some "modifications"
Post Reply